Friday, April 23, 2021

week 15: summary of Quality Check your Tech 6 Strategies

One thing I learned from my now retired assistant principal is that all instructional decisions must have a purpose and come from research based strategies. This article discusses how it’s important to critically examine new adaptations of technology and make sure they are meeting the needs of all learners. Even if a tool shows student progress, we need to examine which students are progressing.

One strategy I appreciated is use the tech like a student. And I would add to this, spend time sitting next to a student and watch them use the tech. I find myself making assumptions about kids already knowing how to use technology when they don’t. Many resources you are able to log in as a student. However, this is my district’s first year using Dreambox Learning for math and I wish I could experience more of the student view.

The second strategy I found quite valuable is asking “how is this tool fundamentally changing something about teaching and learning?” (Rupa Chandra Gupta). It’s definitely tempting to use cool flashy tools (especially when they increase student engagement), but I think it’s essential for teachers to be able to explicitly articulate their instructional decision and purpose for using a certain tech tool. We don't have time to waste using tools that don't support instruction. 

2 comments:

  1. These are good points. There have been many kids in my class that struggle to use technology. There are certain activities I have them do that are game based. They have trouble coordinating their fingers to click the keys to maneuver their avatar. Each year I like to learn who does and does not play video games.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is really helpful! Your ideas about student view on new tools is very helpful. It amazes me how different the teacher view and the student views can be. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete